What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and - Vice And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. Does Donald Trump stand for traditional values? Happiness is a confused notion, basically it relies on the subjects inability or unreadiness to fully confront the consequences of his / her / their desire. As the debate ostensibly revolved around comparing capitalism to Marxism, Peterson spent the majority of his 30-minute introduction assailing The Communist Manifesto, in fact coming up with 10 reasons against it. Source: www.the-sun.com. I can see no threat to free creativity in this program on the contrary, I saw health care and education and so on as enabling me to focus my life on important creative issues. What does this mean? But if violence perpetuated in the name of an idea is supposed to disqualify the idea, then more people have died in the name of communism and nationalism than any other idea. Regarding to the Peterson-Zizek debate as a whole, yes, I would recommend a listen. Posted on August 20, 2021 by David Roman. Peterson and Zizek Debate Transcription : r/zizek - reddit Some idea make a reappearance, other are newly developed, but it's Having listened to the recent debate between the philosopher Slavoj Zizek and the politician Daniel Hannan, one has the impression of having assisted to a sophisticated version of a sophomoric discussion between a marijuana-smoking hippy and the head of the Tory Students' Association at a posh college. "[1][6] According to Matthew Sharpe writing for The Conversation, .mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 40px}.mw-parser-output .templatequote .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;padding-left:1.6em;margin-top:0}, the term 'cultural Marxism' moved into the media mainstream around 2016, when psychologist Jordan Peterson was protesting a Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender. clear these are coherent thoughts from the same thinker. The tone of the debate was also noted to be very Other than that, multiple commentators (one, two) pointed that the "Debate SLAVOJ IEK: . So, what about the balance equality and hierarchy? Last nights sold-out debate between Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek and Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson at the Sony Centre was pitched as a no-holds-barred throw down . He's also quite Hitler provided a story, a plot, which was precisely that of a Jewish plot: we are in this mess because of the Jews. His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of expressions like You have to give the devil his due and This is a weird one and Almost all ideas are wrong. Community Video : Free Community : Free Download, Borrow and - Archive But this divine spark enables us to create what Christians call holy ghost or holy spirit a community which hierarchic family values are at some level, at least, abolished. What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek iek was less a cognizant thinker and more a pathological sacred cow tipper while Peterson was a bard for the. Both Zizek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debate we hope will transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame of happiness of human flourishing itself. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. Before you say, its a utopia, I will tell you just think about in what way the market already functions today. iek asked what Peterson meant by cultural Marxists when postmodern thinkers, like Foucault, werent Marxist at all. [16][17] In a similar fashion, iek asked Peterson to name him personal names of "postmodern neo-Marxists" in Western academia and from where he got the statistical numbers because according to him the over-the-top political correctness is opposed to Marxism, to which Peterson replied that his references are aimed towards ideas that are connected with Marxism and postmodernism as a pheonomenon and not necessarily towards people defining themselves as such. But there was one truly fascinating moment in the evening. The first one agreed that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past end of quote. Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek: The debate. | by Ulysses Alvarez with only surface differences (some, though not all, could be chalked to their Peterson noted at the outset that he'd set a personal milestone: StubHub tickets to the debate were going for more money than Maple Leafs playoff ticketsa big deal in Toronto. and our It was billed as a meeting of titans and that it was not. Really? I was surprised (and a bit disappointed) that Peterson didn't seem more Come here for focussed discussion and debate on the Giant of Ljubljana, Slavoj iek and the Slovenian school of psychoanalytically informed philosophy. Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate Current Affairs However, I would like to add here a couple of qualifications. Studies suggest that meditation can quiet the restless brain. Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. Such thinking also underpinned Peterson arguing that no matter what social system you build, communism included, power will always fall to a select group. El debate Peterson-iek, oficialmente titulado Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, fue un debate entre el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson (crtico del marxismo) y el filsofo esloveno Slavoj iek ( comunista y hegeliano) sobre la relacin entre marxismo, capitalismo y felicidad. I am not making just a joke here because I think it is exactly like this and thats the lesson psychoanalysis, that our sexuality, our sexual instincts are, of course, biologically determined but look what we humans made out of that. so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we a.Teams are iterating, but the system is not b.Conflict and disagreement on processes and practices are difficult to, Program Increment (PI) Planning is a major event that requires preparation, coordination, and communication. Error message: "The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your. Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? wanted to review a couple of passages and i didnt need to go through the video! When I was younger to give you a critical example there was in Germany with obsession with the dying of forests with predictions that in a couple of decades Europe would be without forests. Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. Scholarly publications with full text pdf download. Peterson is his usual intensely-driven professorial self, which I personally Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate | Current Affairs I crunched some numbers to find out", "Best academic steel-cage match ever? Here refugees are created. History and diagnosis transcript dr. Peterson discussing "happiness, capitalism vs. Extracto del debate realizado el 19 04 19 entre el psiclogo clnico y crtico cultural jordan peterson y el filsofo y psicoanalista slavoj . He did voice support for free education and universal health care as necessary for people to reach their potentials and pointed to the economic success of China, a quasi-capitalist system without democracy. It was in this opening argument that Zizek effectively won the debate to the extent it was a debate at all. The mere dumb presence of the celebrities on the stage mattered vastly more than anything they said, naturally. Why would the proletariat be more capable of leading? The title of the debate was "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." The structure of the debate was that each participant presented a thirty-minute introduction followed by a series of brief ten-minute responses to one another. We're in for quite a night a quick word about format. For example, an example not from neo-conservatives. The French philosophy Andr Glucksmann applied Dostoyevskys critique of godless nihilism to September 11 and the title of his book, Dostoyevsky in Manhattan suggests that he couldnt have been more wrong. them, of all things, to French cuisine) are also worth a listen/read. intellectuals). In Stalinism, precisely they were not kept apart, while already in Ancient Greece they knew they had to be kept apart, which is why the popular way was even combined with lottery often. He too finished his remarks with a critique of political correctness, which he described as the world of impotence that masks pure defeat. cordial and respectful, something I really appreciated. They returned to their natural subject: who is the enemy? It made me wonder about the rage consuming all public discussion at the moment: are we screaming at each other because we disagree or because we do agree and we cant imagine a solution? If Peterson was an ill-prepared prof, iek was a columnist stitching together a bunch of 1,000-worders. It's hard not to crack up when out of time for Far from pushing us too far, the Left is gradually losing its ground already for decades. But it did reveal one telling commonality. critcial theorists that were widely read. Once traditional authority loses its substantial power, it is not possible to return to it. Similarly, he's crusading against towards disaster, maybe some catastrophes can shake us out of our ruts. officially desire. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. "almost all ideas are wrong". In a similar way, the Alt-Right obsession with cultural Marxism expresses the rejection to confront that phenomenon they criticise as the attack of the cultural Marxist plot moral degradation, sexual promiscuity, consumerist hedonism, and so on are the outcomes of the immanent dynamic of capitalist societies. What if secretly they know she would kill her child again. by its protagonists. semi-intentionally quite funny. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. All such returns are today a post-modern fake. Therefore they retreat. [20] Stephen Marche of The Guardian wrote that Peterson's opening remarks about The Communist Manifesto were "vague and not particularly informed", and that Peterson seemed generally unprepared,[21] while Jordan Foissy of Vice wrote that Peterson was "completely vacuous", making "ludicrous claims like no one has ever gotten power through exploiting people". Id like the share the debate with a hearing impaired friend. The size and scope of his fame registers more or less exactly the loathing for identity politics in the general populace, because it certainly isnt on the quality of his books that his reputation resides. [16] Similarly to Winston Churchill, he concluded that "capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others". The true utopia is that we can survive without such a change. Please feel free to correct this document. So, the term Cultural Marxism plays that of the Jewish plot in anti-Semitism. Two Teams Per Debate Argue For Opposing Positions On An Issue. Another issue is that it's hard to pin down what communism is Is such a change a utopia? In the 1920s many Germans experienced their situation as a confused mess. China in the last decades is arguably the greatest economic success story in human history. [15][16] On the example of China, he tried to connect happiness, capitalism, and Marxism as well criticize China itself[16] and asserted that "less hierarchical, more egalitarian social structure would stand to produce great amounts of this auxiliary happiness-runoff". Thats the big of ideologies how to make good, decent people do horrible things. In such times of urgency, when we know we have to act but dont know how to act, thinking is needed. And I must agree. A warm welcome to all of you here this evening, both those here in the, theatre in Toronto and those following online. Remove him from his enemies and he is a very poor example of a very old thing the type of writer whom, from Samuel Smiles Self-Help to Eckhart Tolles The Power of Now, have promised simple answers to complex problems. live commentary is quite funny. Ive been a professor, so I know what its like to wake up with a class scheduled and no lecture prepared. But, a danger lurks here, that of a subtly reversal: dont fall in love thats my position with your suffering. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. strongest point. In the end Peterson-iek was less of a heavyweight boxing match than a WWE Grand Slam. IEK V/S PETERSON: Anlisis del "debate del siglo". We are responsible for our burdens. Cookie Notice Globalnews.ca your source for the latest news on presidential debate. Key Agile Release Train stakeholders, including Business Owners, What can occur as a result of not having an Innovation and Planning Iteration? manifesto, which he'd re-read for the occasion. This is again not a moral reproach. Good evening and welcome to the Sony Center for Performing Arts. Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. [2], Peterson has been seen as misusing the term postmodernism, referring to postmodern philosophy, as a stand-in term for the far-right and antisemitic Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. April 20, 2019. This page was last edited on 12 August 2019, at 11:41. Zizek also pinpointed white liberal multiculturalism as the reason for the Lefts current political woes. What qualifies them to pass a judgement in such a delicate matter? Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer.. About No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis Two Famous Academics, 3,000 Fans, $1,500 Tickets Pity Jordan Peterson. The Hidden Argument in the Zizek/Peterson Debate, From a Competitive Debator | by Timothy Clark | Dialogue & Discourse | Medium 500 Apologies, but something went wrong on our end. However, this is not enough. They can develop into a permanent obsession sustained by obstacles that demand to be overcome in short, into a properly metaphysical passion that preserves the biologically rhythm, like endlessly prolonging satisfaction in courtly love, engaging in different perversions and so on and so on. And we should act in a large scale, collective way. The Zizek Peterson Debate 18 May 2019 Having previously enjoyed and written about both Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson, I was interested to learn they'd have a debate. Peterson opens with a 30-minutes speech where he criticizes the communist And, in the new afterword, Bell offers a bracing perspective of contemporary Western societies, revealing the crucial cultural fault lines we face as the 21st century is here. 25 Debate quotes that show Jordan Peterson doesn't know what - Medium Furthermore, I think that social power and authority cannot be directly grounded in competence. Zizek is particularly culpable here, for ridiculing the form. It's funny to see Peterson Somehow hectoring mobs have managed to turn him into an icon of all they are not. And sure, the level of the discussion might have been unappealing to all the Furthermore, I find it very hard to ground todays inequalities as they are documented for example by Piketty in his book to ground todays inequalities in different competencies. His thoughts on social constructionism vs evolutionary psychology (comparing Freedom and responsibility hurt they require an effort, and the highest function of an authentic master is to literally to awake in us to our freedom. Peterson and Zizek Debate | PDF | Capitalism | Karl Marx - Scribd We are spontaneously really free. The turn towards culture as a key component of capitalist reproduction and concurrent to it the commodification of cultural life itself are I think crucial moments of capitalism expanded reproduction. Zizek's opening statement is probably the most interesting part of the debate. It came right at the end of ieks opening 30-minute remarks. This is why egalitarianism itself should never be accepted at its face value. Why do I still cling to this cursed name when I know and fully admit that the 20th century Communist project in all its failure, how it failed, giving birth to new forms of murderous terror. The lesson of todays terrorism is that if there is a god then everything even blowing up hundreds of innocent bystanders is permitted to those who claim to act directly on behalf of god. 'Crustacean Jung v Cocaine Hegel': Zizek-Peterson debate blowout sparks Still, that criticism would be salutary for most "communists" Below is the transcript of Zizeks introductory statement. Debate is a process that involves formal discourse on a particular topic, often including a moderator and audience. Peterson retreats into the integrity of character and Judeo-Christian values as he sees them. If we compare with Trump with Bernie Sanders, Trump is a post-modern politician at its purist while Sanders is rather an old fashion moralist. But precisely due to the marketing, almost sweating from concentration trying to discern a thread. And I claim the same goes for tradition. What appears as its excesses its regulatory zeal is I think an impotent reaction that masks the reality of a defeat. Weeks before the debate began, I already saw many similarities between Zizek and Peterson, such as their views on struggle, their stance against political correctness, and the problem on ideology. Warlords who rule provinces there are always dealing with Western companies, selling them minerals where would our computers be without coltan from Congo? It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. Peterson blamed cultural Marxism for phenomena like the movement to respect gender-neutral pronouns which, in his view, undermines freedom of speech. ", Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window), Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window), Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window), Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window), Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window), Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window). But these two towering figures of different disciplines and domains share more than a. commitment to thinking itself. Incidentally, so that you will not think that I do not know what I am talking about, in Communist countries those in power were obsessed with expanded reproduction, and were not under public control, so the situation was even worse. Journal articles: 'Marxism in politics, economy and philosophy (Chinas success makes a joke out of the whole premise of the debate: the old-fashioned distinction between communism and capitalism.) EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson Disfrut la discusin filosfica entre Michel Onfay y Alain Badiou , pesos pesados del pensamiento alternativo, y qued satisfecho. Explain The Format And Rules Of A Formal Debate. - DEBATE JKW Learn how your comment data is processed. News About Presidential Debate - DEBATE JKW There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers. The debate itself was framed as a free-spirited competition, "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism" two ideologies enter the ring, and in a world where we are free to think for ourselves, the true ideology would emerge victorious as 'truth.' Rules for Life, as if there were such things. So it seems to me likely we will see tonight not only deep differences, but also surprising agreement on deep questions. Chopin Nocturne No. I cleaned up the Zizek's second turn speaking, since that section seemed to contain many errors: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs7mNIUsYt9kWcdO785ec_dEWmEHLo92yTso0CVtxNk/edit?usp=sharing. yardstick: In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, Zizek and Peterson sell books for cash, but cash is just what you need for the real prize: the minds of men. self-reproducing nature to ("the historical necessity of progress towards The very premise of tonight's event is that we all participate in the life of, thought. Zizek Peterson Debate Transcript. The pathological element is the husbands need for jealousy as the only way for him to sustain his identity. Zizek versus Peterson Peterson argues against the postmodern neo-Marxist position held by, in his terms, "the radical left." This position emerged during the '60s but was initiated by the Frankfurt School, which emerged after World War II as a response to the rise of fascism in Europe. interesting because of it. After writing less than nothing, zizek thought that he didn't yet get to the basic thought, that is the reason he wrote absolute recoil, a more difficult book than less than nothing, according. Peterson-iek debate - Wikipedia Studebaker concludes that "Peterson didn't prepare. El debate entre iek y Peterson se produjo en Toronto, Canad. The statement has some interesting ideas though, including the statement that Then once you factor in the notion that much of Marxism is . Nothing Is a Greater Waste of Time Than the Planned Debate Between 2 Piano Mono - moshimo sound design. Doctor Slavoj iek is as philosopher. Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I haven't caught and corrected (I didn't expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how Amidst the Peterson-Zizek Debate, We Should Still Think for Ourselves The experience that we have of our lives from within, the story we tell ourselves about ourselves, in order to account for what we are doing is and this is what I call ideology fundamentally a lie. Read the full transcript. Im far from a simple social constructionism here. The rest of the debate was (if memory serves) also interesting, but it gets even More than a century ago in his Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky warned against the dangers of godless moral nihilism if god doesnt exist, then everything is permitted. A French guy gave me this idea, that the origin of many famous French dishes or drinks is that when they wanted to produce a standard piece of food or drink, something went wrong, but then they realised that this failure can be resold as success. This is a pity, because Peterson made an argument I have seen many times, one which is incredibly easy to beat." Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript - DEBATGR So, you know the market is already limited but not in the right way, to put it naively. The Jordan Peterson-Slavoj iek debate was good for something It was full of the stench of burning strawmen. Highlights of the "debate of the century": Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek Peterson had trapped himself into a zero-sum game, Zizek had opened up a. consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise How did China achieve it? This largely contrasts Peterson's viewpoint who admittedly has never used that term to refer in any way to the associated conspiracy theory, but only to raise critique about cultural phenomena that are, according to him, directly associated with postmodern thought. 2 define the topic, if . Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. Scientific data seems, to me at least, abundant enough. iek & Peterson Debate - Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (transcript Maybe that's why last night I finally caved and watched Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson take on Slovenian quasi-Marxist psychoanalyst and cultural theorist Slavoj Zizek. Forced marriages and homophobia is ok, just as long as they are limited to another country which is otherwise fully included in the world market. Billed as "The Debate Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript.docx - Happiness: The Master and His Emissary: A Conversation with Dr. Iain McGilchrist Transcript . With anti-Semitism, we are approaching the topic of telling stories. So, here I think I know its provocative to call this a plea for communism, I do it a little bit to provoke things but what is needed is nonetheless in all these fears I claim ecology, digital control, unity of the world a capitalist market which does great things, I admit it, has to be somehow limited, regulated and so on. There is no simple democratic solution here. Zizek expressed his agreement with Petersons critique of PC culture, pointing out that he is attacked as much by the Left that he supposedly represents as the right. back to this pre-modern state of affairs. Im Zentrum der Dissertation steht die Typologisierung des homme fatal, des verhngnisvollen Verfhrers innerhalb der englischen Erzhlliteratur von der Romantik bis ins fin de sicle. matters: meaning, truth, freedom. Due to a planned power outage on Friday, 1/14, between 8am-1pm PST, some services may be impacted. Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. norswap The Zizek Peterson Debate The event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian Slavoj iek, considering Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism in Toronto. [15], Peterson's opening monologue was a reading and critical analysis of The Communist Manifesto. Directly sharing your experience with our beloved may appear attractive, but what about sharing them with an agency without you even knowing it? Marxism: Zizek/Peterson: Official Video Jordan B Peterson 6.5M subscribers Subscribe 86K 4.3M views 3 years ago I posted this yesterday, but the volume was too low, so now it's been raised.. He makes a big deal out of how he obsessed about It Was In This Opening Argument That Zizek Effectively Won The Debate To The Extent It Was A Debate At All. He is a conservative. I have a hard time understanding Zizek, and am admittedly completely out of my depth when it comes to philosophy and Marxism and all the nitty gritty. If I visit your debate with Jordan Peterson it's on YouTube I felt you won that debate, and it's striking to me, the discussion between 1 hour 10 minutes and 1 hour 18 minutes. Modernity means that yes, we should carry the burden, but the main burden is freedom itself. But I nonetheless found it interesting. Slavoj Zizek Peterson Debate - DEBATGR Competencies for what? This means something, but nature I think we should never forget this is not a stable hierarchical system but full of improvisations.